"Wealth and power tend to accrue to those who are ruthless, cunning, avaricious, self-seeking, lacking in sympathy and compassion, subservient to authority and willing to abandon principle for material gain, and so on." - Noam Chomsky
News Flash!
Posted by zophiel on Apr 15, 2004 11:34PM (PST)
from the dept.
News
Stolen from Crimethinc.

Face it, your politics are boring as fuck.

You know it's true. Otherwise, why does everyone cringe when you say the word? Why has attendance at your anarcho-communist theory discussion group meetings fallen to an all—time low? Why has the oppressed proletariat not come to its senses and joined you in your fight for world liberation?

Perhaps, after years of struggling to educate them about their victimhood, you have come to blame them for their condition. They must want to be ground under the heel of capitalist imperialism; otherwise, why do they show no interest in your political causes? Why haven't they joined you yet in chaining yourself to mahogany furniture, chanting slogans at carefully planned and orchestrated protests, and frequenting anarchist bookshops? Why haven't they sat down and learned all the terminology necessary for a genuine understanding of the complexities of Marxist economic theory?

The truth is, your politics are boring to them because they really are irrelevant. They know that your antiquated styles of protest—your marches, hand held signs, and gatherings—are now powerless to effect real change because they have become such a predictable part of the status quo. They know that your post-Marxist jargon is off-putting because it really is a language of mere academic dispute, not a weapon capable of undermining systems of control. They know that your infighting, your splinter groups and endless quarrels over ephemeral theories can never effect any real change in the world they experience from day to day. They know that no matter who is in office, what laws are on the books, what "ism"s the intellectuals march under, the content of their lives will remain the same. They—we—know that our boredom is proof that these "politics" are not the key to any real transformation of life. For our lives are boring enough already!

And you know it too. For how many of you is politics a responsibility? Something you engage in because you feel you should, when in your heart of hearts there are a million things you would rather be doing? Your volunteer work—is it your most favorite pastime, or do you do it out of a sense of obligation? Why do you think it is so hard to motivate others to volunteer as you do? Could it be that it is, above all, a feeling of guilt that drives you to fulfill your "duty" to be politically active? Perhaps you spice up your "work" by trying (consciously or not) to get in trouble with the authorities, to get arrested: not because it will practically serve your cause, but to make things more exciting, to recapture a little of the romance of turbulent times now long past. Have you ever felt that you were participating in a ritual, a long-established tradition of fringe protest, that really serves only to strengthen the position of the mainstream? Have you ever secretly longed to escape from the stagnation and boredom of your political "responsibilities"?

It's no wonder that no one has joined you in your political endeavors. Perhaps you tell yourself that it's tough, thankless work, but somebody's got to do it. The answer is, well, NO.

You actually do us all a real disservice with your tiresome, tedious politics. For in fact, there is nothing more important than politics. NOT the politics of American "democracy" and law, of who is elected state legislator to sign the same bills and perpetuate the same system. Not the politics of the "I got involved with the radical left because I enjoy quibbling over trivial details and writing rhetorically about an unreachable utopia" anarchist. Not the politics of any leader or ideology that demands that you make sacrifices for "the cause." But the politics of our everyday lives. When you separate politics from the immediate, everyday experiences of individual men and women, it becomes completely irrelevant. Indeed, it becomes the private domain of wealthy, comfortable intellectuals, who can trouble themselves with such dreary, theoretical things. When you involve yourself in politics out of a sense of obligation, and make political action into a dull responsibility rather than an exciting game that is worthwhile for its own sake, you scare away people whose lives are already far too dull for any more tedium. When you make politics into a lifeless thing, a joyless thing, a dreadful responsibility, it becomes just another weight upon people, rather than a means to lift weight from people. And thus you ruin the idea of politics for the people to whom it should be most important. For everyone has a stake in considering their lives, in asking themselves what they want out of life and how they can get it. But you make politics look to them like a miserable, self-referential, pointless middle class/bohemian game, a game with no relevance to the real lives they are living out.

What should be political? Whether we enjoy what we do to get food and shelter. Whether we feel like our daily interactions with our friends, neighbors, and coworkers are fulfilling. Whether we have the opportunity to live each day the way we desire to. And "politics" should consist not of merely discussing these questions, but of acting directly to improve our lives in the immediate present. Acting in a way that is itself entertaining, exciting, joyous—because political action that is tedious, tiresome, and oppressive can only perpetuate tedium, fatigue, and oppression in our lives. No more time should be wasted debating over issues that will be irrelevant when we must go to work again the next day. No more predictable ritual protests that the authorities know all too well how to deal with; no more boring ritual protests which will not sound like a thrilling way to spend a Saturday afternoon to potential volunteers—clearly, those won't get us anywhere. Never again shall we "sacrifice ourselves for the cause." For we ourselves, happiness in our own lives and the lives of our fellows, must be our cause!

After we make politics relevant and exciting, the rest will follow. But from a dreary, merely theoretical and/or ritualized politics, nothing valuable can follow. This is not to say that we should show no interest in the welfare of humans, animals, or ecosystems that do not contact us directly in our day to day existence. But the foundation of our politics must be concrete: it must be immediate, it must be obvious to everyone why it is worth the effort, it must be fun in itself. How can we do positive things for others if we ourselves do not enjoy our own lives?

To make this concrete for a moment: an afternoon of collecting food from businesses that would have thrown it away and serving it to hungry people and people who are tired of working to pay for food—that is good political action, but only if you enjoy it. If you do it with your friends, if you meet new friends while you're doing it, if you fall in love or trade funny stories or just feel proud to have helped a woman by easing her financial needs, that's good political action. On the other hand, if you spend the afternoon typing an angry letter to an obscure leftist tabloid objecting to a columnist's use of the term "anarcho-syndicalist," that's not going to accomplish shit, and you know it.

Perhaps it is time for a new word for "politics," since you have made such a swear word out of the old one. For no one should be put off when we talk about acting together to improve our lives. And so we present to you our demands, which are non-negotiable, and must be met as soon as possible—because we're not going to live forever, are we?

1. Make politics relevant to our everyday experience of life again. The farther away the object of our political concern, the less it will mean to us, the less real and pressing it will seem to us, and the more wearisome politics will be.

2. All political activity must be joyous and exciting in itself. You cannot escape from dreariness with more dreariness.

3. To accomplish those first two steps, entirely new political approaches and methods must be created. The old ones are outdated, outmoded. Perhaps they were NEVER any good, and that's why our world is the way it is now.

4. Enjoy yourselves! There is never any excuse for being bored... or boring!

Join us in making the "revolution" a game; a game played for the highest stakes of all, but a joyous, carefree game nonetheless!

[ Post Comment ] Print this article

News Flash! | Preferences | 28 comment(s) | Viewed 4990 times
Useful, however Anxious
by Borodin on Aug 25, 2004 02:21AM (PST)
I've always liked that article, for some reason, even though it does seem to project the author's own indulgent and pious revelations.
[ Parent ]
Zoph's got a point, now where do we go from here?
by Raven on Apr 19, 2004 12:37PM (PST)
Kult used to be a place where I checked in at least daily. Why? I enjoyed it then. Honestly, I haven't been enjoying it in a long time, and I guess I never really realized it was that simple.

On Saturday, I went to an Earth Day event that some of our local geocachers put on. We were removing trash from a local park, as a way of giving back to the park system that so kindly houses us. Did any of us go because we enjoy picking up broken glass bottles and cigarette butts? I doubt it. I go to practically every geocaching event that I can, simply because it's a good group of people and we always have a lot of fun. If we're doing something that benefits the environment, all the better.

So, how can we make this fun again? I'm tired of the dark, brooding angst and the attitude that we can never accomplish anything. Surely we're still capable of having a good time. I know I am.

[ Parent ]
typical Crimethinc
by Zerstorer on Apr 16, 2004 04:37PM (PST)
This is typically Crimethinc- a post-hippy over-individualist anti-intellectual "anarchism" which would have us digging through dumpsters and prancing through the streets, living on the scraps of consumerism, playing in the walls between the state and corporations, but undermining neither. This sort of crap is most feasible to those who don't actually have to work to live, who don't have families to support (but have families to support them).
Let's call it a fake upper middle class revolution-party, rather than anything substantial.

They know that your infighting, your splinter groups and endless quarrels over ephemeral theories can never effect any real change in the world they experience from day to day.

And this Crimethinc article isn't just that?

On the other hand, if you spend the afternoon typing an angry letter to an obscure leftist tabloid objecting to a columnist's use of the term "anarcho-syndicalist," that's not going to accomplish shit, and you know it.

This article is essentially just such an attack on anarcho-syndicalism, but it relies on straw-man argument and name-calling rhetoric (ie: calling things 'boring' and citing imaginary anecdotal evidence) rather than rational or historical argument. Fuck that bullshit.

"To make this concrete for a moment: an afternoon of collecting food from businesses that would have thrown it away and serving it to hungry people and people who are tired of working to pay for food..."

This action fundamentally requires the capitalist system and relieves the stresses that it creates - it does not undermine the current system or create alternatives. It is not essentially differant than from what the Salvation Army does at Christmas. Sure, it is a good thing to do, but it doesn't change things.

As for the four points:

1. Make politics relevant to our everyday experience of life again. The farther away the object of our political concern, the less it will mean to us, the less real and pressing it will seem to us, and the more wearisome politics will be.

This is quite true, but not how this guy imagines. Politics must be made relevant to EVERYONE's daily life - not just the daily life of rich white kids that can drop in on their parents when they get too cold or need to get a cavity filled.

2. All political activity must be joyous and exciting in itself. You cannot escape from dreariness with more dreariness.

They seem fixated on making the world as pleasurable and exciting as possible. It is like the modern day ADD anarchist trying to get the same thing from being a part of the "revolution scene" that they get from watching MTV. Life is not about constant pleasure. First comes the need to SURVIVE, -everyone's- need to survive, not just the need for some bourgeois kid to be constantly amused and excited. Let's give all the people of the world the infrastructure to survive in relative comfort before we worry about holding a 24/7 rave scavenged and stolen from the scraps of a worldwide system that victimizes billions of human beings.

3. To accomplish those first two steps, entirely new political approaches and methods must be created. The old ones are outdated, outmoded. Perhaps they were NEVER any good, and that's why our world is the way it is now.

Yes. And REAL revolutionary movements are doing just that, like the Zapatista movement in Mexico organizing the communal economy and governing of villages.

4. Enjoy yourselves! There is never any excuse for being bored... or boring!

I think I covered this on the second point.
Crimethinc is a bunch of anti-intellectual and anti-worker consumer-revolution crap.

[ Parent ]
Re: Poletics
by p_themusicgod1 on Apr 16, 2004 08:46AM (PST)
AAAAAAAAAAAAARGGGGG 

YOU SHOULD NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER
 EVER EVER EVER EVER BE FUCKING BORED!!
no offence, zophiel.
that being said I think that this post is a great one, despite my 
complete utter vehement dissagreance with it.

A) poletics IS important, and while the poletics of the day to day is 
very important so too is knowing exactly what is going on.  I've been 
listening to noam chomsky lately and, while not really learning anything 
new, have seen specifics that I before only knew generalities of.
* The United States of America is a Terrorist State
* The United Nations actually, despite its uselessness, stands for 
pretty much what we do, or did until around the 50s.  The best thing 
about it is that almost if not every state in the world is a member, and 
at least claims to uphold their end of their being a member.  This means 
things like the declaration of human rights and the rights of a child 
are NOT futile, although mabye unenforcable most of the time, are still 
technically legal.  and furthermore,  democratically elected and 
responsible people coming together as a group and making descisions is 
in my opinion at least a GOOD way of doing things, and WAY better than 
the WTO/trade group/non-representive, non-government, pro-multinational 
corporate way.

No one around here is interested because 
a) they are too rich, think they are, or are brainwashed by those who are
b) are stoned
d) they are just plain dumb
e) are blistfully unaware of what's really going on in the world, and 
are middle class. 
f) want to be any of the above

B) WHY ARE YOUR LIVES SO DULL!!?? Holy Fuck people!!! i mean, Come on!!! 
take some drugs, do something, I can't even stand to be paid to be bored 
any more.  Poletics should NOT be for your own gain, PERIOD. this is how 
corruption begins.  Sure, some people are stuck in boring jobs (mostly 
due to capitalism, and the control of the middle class through 
"necessarry" jobs that are completely unnecessarry.  Not everyone needs 
to work any more, even though everyone needs a paycheck. western 
civilization, at least in north america would be fine with about a 
third of its current workforce working, running 24 hours a 
day...probably fine with a sixth for 12 hours a day.  This means 
something like the population of america and some of its south american 
colonies basically not working, ever.)

C) People are so fucking busy they don't have time, or can't afford 
poletics.  Single mothers, and other hard working ilk,don't have time or 
money to spend in poletics, on all levels.  Just shut up, do as your 
told, don't look political, don't even *think* about organizing and 
you can keep your job and continue to support your family.  Don't put
anything in your body that might make your work less efficient, less
effective, and defininitely don't involve yourself with anyone during
your 'off work' time (roughly one hour, if your lucky, more than you 
should be sleeping per day) that might be considerred politically 
incorrect, and by politically incorrect i mean 'against the current 
system of thought'.  Amerima has always been at war with the middle 
east.  Security is peace, Pornography is evil. 

Why are there so god damned many churches around here? because people do 
as they are told and do not question, and by and large just soak up 
anything done to them.  THIS is one reason why there is a lack of 
political activity.  the second is an active / consious brainwashing 
through the media of the working class.  Not everyone who takes part in 
it is part of the people who determine what's going on, and some of the 
people who determine what's going on don't have a clue, but make no 
mistake, there are forces out there that is trying to mold your way of 
thinking.  How many corporations are left that own all media, now, 4? 2?
Anyways back to the churches part, according to Noam Chomsky, societies 
which have a functioning labour movement (ie, not the United States) 
have better functioning social structure/contract and a better 
functioning democracy that more represents the people.  Wonder why 
people aren't concerned with local poletics?   One more reason is most 
definitely a failed, broken or at least somewhat weakened labour 
movement.  And since NAFTA/WTO/respective interests are actively trying 
to crush all pro-labour organizations (which they are, and I can assure 
you outside of what Noam Chomsky has claimed.  Don't get me wrong, I 
don't just soak up everything he sais without question: although he 
does state this quite clearly--I have many angles as far as why the 
WTO/NAFTA/FTAA are most definitely bad for labour), and succeeding, I 
think this may very well be one reason why activity everywhere is low.

D) some "Ritual Protests" may be pointless.  and yes, they are widely 
ignored by the system, especially the media.  but *especially* these 
ritual protests serve a few purposes
a) Networking.  Personally, i Hate the word, and the concept. but it 
works, and there's no better way of meeting interesting people with 
minds like to yours, or hell, even completely different but otherwise 
intelligent or at least political(whatever that is) than going to a 
protest on a no-brainer that the system isn't really paying attention to 
in the first place.  Very few people in this city are for the War on 
Iraq, yet why were there demonstrations against it (especially 
considerring at the time of the demonstrations, it was not known that 
Canadians were going to be involved at all.  Why bother protest the 
actions of one forign fascist state against another?  It's pointless~!)
But in the meanwhile, a lot of people meet another lot of people, and 
ideas are made, groups are formed, and it is through these groups that 
changes are made, and Real Things Happen. or at least there's a lot of 
good drugs consumed.
b) SEX
seriously, hippie chicks rock, and there are definitely people who go to protests not because they believe in a cause, but becuase they are male, and lonely, and since there are no women just laying around looking for lonely guys, you have to do something to fufil your vulgar, same goes for women, to a lesser degree(sick of lame guys? go to a protest! you'll definitley meet someone with half a brain. mabye only half, but that's better than you normally get, I bet) and even if no one does this yet, YOU SHOULD if you are single. beats the hell out of beating yourself up over beating yourself up in a bar poisoning yourself and killing your brain with alchohol that being said i think there is some grains of truth in this article, but most of it is exactly the kind of dialectical-elastic-snap-back that jello biafra warned us about. c) Perhaps, just perhaps, if the population of the people attending the rallies increased 10 or 100 fold, real change would happen damn near instantly. What if the entire working class revolted in an area? or the entire city of another area? change would happen. The only thing keeping this from happening is i) Things aren't bad enough. they might be about to be, if things keep up the way they are going ii) people are ignorant/dormant/whatever. this might be solvable by i iii) people think that protests are futile people protesting means things have gone wrong. E) businesses will not give you food, it is not within their best interest to give away any food. none of the resturants I have worked for has given food away. They would rather throw it out, and desecrate it before they do this so no one can eat it after it is thrown out. Why does this person even think that it's possible to get anything free out of businesses, who we all know seek nothing but profit. F) making a new word for poletics is about as effective as making a new word for 'hacker' (cracker) when the word hacker went bad. it was completely futile. G) the revolution is not a 'game'. Try telling that to the WTO protesters in '98 who were tagged and after the protests were over were tracked down by police goon squads, and beaten mercilessly, and were hospitalized, to make an example of them. Try telling that to student protesters raped and killed by the Army in student demonstrations in the 60's. Try telling that to the communists of the 1910s, the resistance movements in 1940s europe, or anyone in cuba. Try telling that to Rachel Corrie.
[ Parent ]
amen, brother, amen
by Ghost on Apr 16, 2004 07:44AM (PST)
Zophiel, as usual, you've hit the nail on the head. your post states exactly the changes needed to set things off. I believe that the changing point in the 1960's had a similiar come-to-realize moment in roughly the same manner as your post. I hope people pay attention. ghost
[ Parent ]
No subject
by Doodle on Apr 16, 2004 07:43AM (PST)
I like. I still think protesting is a fine way to object to things, but the fella who wrote this did have some nice points (ex - They know that your infighting, your splinter groups and endless quarrels over ephemeral theories can never effect any real change in the world they experience from day to day.)
Speaking of politics, Ralph Nader is looking for volunteers. Also, he'll be speaking at a coffee house in Redbank, NJ soon, so you east coasters who want to go should talk to me.
-Doodle.
[ Parent ]